top headlinesfederal newsstate newslocal newsvoices


 

About this site


About the J-School

 

 

Ignored by the Prop. 36 Campaign, a Community Copes with its Drug Problem

By Annelise Wunderlich

 

 

SAN FRANCISCO—A block away and a world apart from some of the trendiest boutiques and restaurants in the Mission District, cars slowly cruise by the pink cement buildings on 15th and Valencia Streets. Many carry customers looking to buy heroin, marijuana, or crack cocaine from the dealers clustered in front of Valencia Gardens—a low-income housing complex police say is known far and wide as a hub of San Francisco’s thriving drug market.

But Valencia Gardens is more than just a one-stop shopping center for narcotics. It is home to more than 300 families, and many residents who say they don’t like what they see going on outside their windows.

"I’m terrified," said Nancy, who declined to give her last name as she dropped her son off at preschool inside the complex. "Three weeks ago there was a drive-by shooting at four in the afternoon, right when my kids were walking home from school."

This is just the kind of neighborhood that would most benefit from a new strategy in the war on drugs, say supporters of Proposition 36, a state ballot initiative that aims to place nonviolent drug users into treatment programs instead of jail. In an ideal world, fewer drugs offenders would be locked up and more would head to treatment centers and turn their lives around. But as most Valencia Gardens residents understand, the ideal is often a mirage.

Life here has a way of moving along untouched by ballot initiatives and political promises. In fact, most residents at the complex, which spreads over two city blocks, have not even heard of Proposition 36. Daily reality presses too hard. Last year, police filed 4, 081 reports from Valencia Gardens, making it the city’s sixth most frequent spot for crime, according to San Francisco Police Department arrest records. Officer Ken Nieman, who has worked the beat for more than 20 years, said that most of the crimes involve people from outside the community who are either using or selling drugs on the street.

"First thing in the morning, you see the crackheads and junkies out there, ready for their fix," Nieman said. "Then they see me pull up in my black and white car and go run and hide in someone’s apartment."

When the day begins with the busy transactions of dealers on their front steps, families inside have had to learn how to cope with drugs in their community.

Behind the high metal fences that surround the complex, a group of small children scramble across monkey bars under the watchful eye of Eva White, the site supervisor at the preschool. She said she is not too worried by the illegal activity a few hundred feet away.

"The people outside selling drugs may be doing bad things to each other, but they are very protective of the children," White said. "And if anything going on looks suspicious, we get the kids inside immediately."

Mirna Escobar, a 60-year old resident, takes a more aggressive approach. She spends time peering through the fence, recording license plate numbers into a notebook.

After she was assaulted two years ago by a drug dealer, Escobar said, she has taken it upon herself to report the people who "are running a drug house" to the police. But she says they don’t take her seriously. "If the police really wanted to, they wouldn’t allow these people to congregate and loiter on this property. It’s a joke."

Anita Ortiz, who runs the electoral poll in Valencia Gardens, said Proposition 36 was unlikely to get much support in her neighborhood—but not because people oppose drug treatment.
"Maybe if we knew about it, we would vote for it," said Ortiz, who also serves as tenants’ association president while raising three of her grandchildren in the complex. Last year, she said, more than 80 percent of registered residents showed up to cast their ballots.

Despite the high voter turnout here, however, neither Proposition 36 supporters nor its opponents have made any attempt to educate residents about the initiative.

"So far we haven’t had the budget in our campaign to do that kind of grassroots outreach," said Daniel Abrahmson, a law professor at UC Berkeley and one of the authors of the proposition.
Brenda Wemiz, a teacher at the preschool, is not so sure the initiative would be anything more than a "temporary solution" to the problem of drug addiction in the community. She said she recently had to complain to security guards when some men were throwing used hypodermic needles from a balcony into an area where children play.

"I see a lot of things working here that I keep to myself," she said as she helped a small girl piece together a jigsaw puzzle. "But I feel good that at least while they’re in here with us, the kids are protected."

While most residents remain in the dark about the possible effects of Proposition 36, many of the police officers and security guards responsible for making arrests in the area know exactly where they stand on the issue.

"It won’t work," said officer Nieman. "I’m not a hardcore cop that wants to put people in jail. But I’ve seen people around here go into a bed-treatment facility and then walk right out. Most of these users don’t want treatment. That is some idea that folks who never talked to a serious junkie get and then write some law. They don’t know what’s really going on out here."

A security guard who works in the complex said that Proposition 36 wouldn’t make much of a difference in San Francisco, where the District Attorney’s office is already infamous for its soft approach to drug-related crime.

Dealers come from places as far as San Mateo and Richmond to sell their goods at Valencia Gardens because they know that in San Francisco they are not likely to end up in jail, said the security guard, who wished to remain anonymous. Police officers and the guards agree that both sellers and users often plea bargain for lighter sentences, only to be placed in diversion programs or on court probation with few incentives to stay clean.

San Francisco District Attorney Terrance Hallinan said he would welcome Proposition 36 to deal with the enormous number of nonviolent drug offenses in neighborhoods like Valencia Gardens.

"Sixty percent of the cases that go through my court are drug-related, and more than half of those would be diverted into treatment programs if Proposition 36 passes," Hallinan said in a phone interview. "If I don’t have to use our resources to prosecute those cases, more of our time would be freed up to effectively deal with murders, rapes, and other more serious crimes."

But some residents and drug abuse counselors in the area are not sure that treatment is the solution for everyone picked up on possession charges.

Many addicts near Valencia Gardens spend some time at Walden House, San Francisco’s largest residential treatment center for substance abuse. Steve Maddox, the intake director of 11 years, hadn’t heard of Proposition 36 either, but he said that drug offenders often don’t take recovery seriously without the threat of jail time hanging over their heads.

"Some folks come here because the court mandated it, or their girlfriends or parents want them to go," he said. "But if you’re not here because you want to be, you usually don’t make it."

A former Valencia Gardens resident, who asked to be called Cinderella, said she had been to Walden House three times to treat her 20-year addiction to crack. She was recently evicted by the San Francisco Housing Authority because her live-in boyfriend violated his probation by failing to appear in drug court.

"Lots of people want to quit, but they can’t. It’s not a physical thing, it’s a mental thing," she said, tears spilling from her clear, hazel eyes. "The longest I stayed clean and sober was five months, but pressure and stress, you know—personal problems—made me go right back to it."

Supporters admit that Proposition 36 cannot possibly eliminate the problem of drug addiction in poverty-stricken areas like Valencia Gardens. But at the very least, Abrahamson said, it sends out a clear signal that the time has come to try "alternative solutions."

Mirna Escobar agrees. "I know it’s not a perfect world, but I don’t feel I have to live like this," she said. "The police tell me, ‘Well, you live in the projects, what do you expect? Move.’ But I was raised in this neighborhood. I know people here. Why should I leave this beautiful place?"


 

UCB Journalism School