{"id":10,"date":"2016-12-14T10:21:47","date_gmt":"2016-12-14T18:21:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/projects.journalism.berkeley.edu\/ousdstem\/?p=10"},"modified":"2017-08-23T14:40:00","modified_gmt":"2017-08-23T21:40:00","slug":"voters-approve-9-billion-for-public-school-construction-repairs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/projects.journalism.berkeley.edu\/ousdstem\/voters-approve-9-billion-for-public-school-construction-repairs\/","title":{"rendered":"Voters approve $9 billion for public school construction, repairs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This week, California voters approved Proposition 51, a $9 billion bond for public school construction and improvement across the state.<\/p>\n<p>By noon on Wednesday, the proposition led 54 percent to 46 percent and the Associated Press had declared the victory.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf you\u2019ve been in some of our most antiquated schools, then you\u2019ve seen, firsthand, how difficult it is to learn in that environment,\u201d said Justine Fischer, president of the California State PTA, a nonpartisan organization that supported the measure. \u201cWe want to make sure that our kids have a safe and quality environment so they can face the challenges ahead of them in education.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Critics of the measure cited concerns over support from special interest groups, such as contractors, construction unions and housing developers, who had a financial stake in approval of the bond. Early public polls in the fall showed the proposition not reaching a majority of support from voters.<\/p>\n<p>Rick Marshall, director of the California Taxpayers Action Network, a nonpartisan organization opposing the proposition, was disappointed by the results. \u201cI was certain that it would be close\u2014certainly closer than some other propositions,\u201d he said. \u201cThere were people who understood that it was all about developer fees, not necessarily school repair, and were willing to vote against it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Proposition 51 was one of 17 propositions voted on Tuesday, amongst other hot topics like marijuana legalization, requiring porn actors to wear condoms and repealing the death penalty. The measure faced a contentious campaign, with the California Republican and Democratic parties supporting it and Governor Jerry Brown opposing it.<\/p>\n<p>However, school bond votes are historically popular in the state. According to the League of California Cities, 80 percent of local measures pass, and the previous four propositions on statewide school bonds were also approved. Californians also voted to approve Proposition 55 which extended income tax on earnings over $250,000 to fund schools and healthcare.<\/p>\n<p>In the end, Proposition 51 was approved with almost 700,000 more votes than the opposing side.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUltimately, Prop. 51 is a really good idea and it\u2019s great that it passed,\u201d said Danny Beesley, the director of FabLabs in Oakland schools. \u201cI\u2019m always hesitant with these things because it\u2019s up to the people managing the money to ensure that it\u2019s going to be spent in a good manner. I think it\u2019s worth the gamble.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This week, California voters approved Proposition 51, a $9 billion bond for public school construction and improvement across the state. By noon on Wednesday, the proposition led 54 percent to 46 percent and the Associated Press had declared the victory. \u201cIf you\u2019ve been in some of our most antiquated schools, then you\u2019ve seen, firsthand, how [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":47,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[6,7,10,13,19,21,25],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.journalism.berkeley.edu\/ousdstem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.journalism.berkeley.edu\/ousdstem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.journalism.berkeley.edu\/ousdstem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.journalism.berkeley.edu\/ousdstem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.journalism.berkeley.edu\/ousdstem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/projects.journalism.berkeley.edu\/ousdstem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":113,"href":"https:\/\/projects.journalism.berkeley.edu\/ousdstem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10\/revisions\/113"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.journalism.berkeley.edu\/ousdstem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/47"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.journalism.berkeley.edu\/ousdstem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.journalism.berkeley.edu\/ousdstem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.journalism.berkeley.edu\/ousdstem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}